Back <<                                                             LETTERS OF COMPLAINT

          The Diffirence Between Where Charlie Was And Where They Have Left Him Now, It's A Disgrace !

                                                                                                    This letter was written to David Hanson MP Minister Of State                                                              

                                                                                                      This letter was written to Maria Eagle MP House of commons

                                                                                                    This letter was written to Governor Ferdy Parker HMP Long Lartin

                                                            This letter was written to Mr Phil Wheatley director general NOMMS parliamentary correspondence and briefing unit

 All These Letters Were Written By Dalanya Morris Charlie's Very Good Friend Who Is Fighting For His Freedom

Parliamentary Correspondence and Briefing Unit, HM Prison Service Headquarters Cleland House Page Street London SW1P 4LN

Dear Sir/Madam,

Ref: Mr Charles Bronson BT1314 HMP Long Lartin South Littleton Evesham Worcetshire WR11 8TZ

I am writing this letter to you in regards to a good friend of mine, the above named person who I will refer to as Charlie. The reason that I am writing is because I would like to register a formal complaint regarding the treatment that he is given and the un necessary distress and trauma that he is constantly caused for no apparent reason. I believe that it is departments like yours that should overlook the handling and treatment of prisoners and ensure that their human rights are not breached. I strongly believe that Mr Bronson’s have and continue to be.

I cannot see no reason or justification for his inhumane and degrading treatment and for the constant need to demoralise him. I would like to register this as a formal complaint and would like to be sent full details of your complaints procedure please.

Charlie has been held in solitary confinement for 30 years. Yet child killers, rapists, terrorists and paedophiles are not held in these conditions and many are freed on parole. Charlie has not only constantly been denied association with other prisoners but he has also been denied physical contact with any of his friends and family for ten years. He has not been able to hug his 78 year old mother for ten years, how can you justify this? This is inhumane. Animals are ensured physical contact yet even though Charlie is caged like one he is still denied this right. I seriously think the prison system needs to make serious changes, just as Charlie himself has done. Charlie has displayed excellent behaviour for many years now and even though he has showed that he can comply with rules and progress the prison service are not allowing him to do so. Why?

Mp Ms Maria Eagle states….”that all prisoners have a right to be treated fairly, decently and humanely.” I therefore would like to question why is Charlie obviously treated as an exception? It is neither fair, decent or humane to keep him on closed visits for ten years. It is a complete disgrace to all the authorities involved and they should me made to justify their decisions. Not just to Charlie but also to the public who are outraged when they hear the truth about his incarceration and treatment. He is constantly antagonised and tortured and all of the authorities are aware of this but allow it continue. Why?

The prison system is supposed to ensure the prisoners are kept in decent safe conditions that ensure the well being of prisoners and that the public have a right to know about the state and effectiveness of our criminal system.

Charlie was held at Hmp Wakefield for a period of six years. On 11^th March it was his parole review. He should have by law received an answer within 14 days. Now to this date he still has not received a response. The Governor of Hmp Wakefield Ms Jacqui Tilley blatantly lied to Charlie to create further torture to Charlie. Why? This needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency and she should be held personally responsible for un necessary stress and duress to Charlie. Charlie was ensured by his legal team, the judge and also by Ms Jacqui Tilley that any move from Hmp Wakefield would be a progressive one for him. Ms Jacqui Tilley the governor informed Charlie that he would be given the answer to his parole on the 27^th April. Then for no apparent reason he was shipped out to Hmp Long Lartin on the 22^nd April. This was not a progressive move for Charlie in fact it has proved to be nothing more than un necessary torture and suffering. He has once again been placed in solitary in a punishment cell where there is a drain in the cell and no lid on his toilet so that he has to endure a foul stench all day. After arriving at Hmp Long Lartin they removed all of his art materials from him for no reason other than to antagonise him and create distress to him. Once again he is being fed by a tray shoved under his door, a way in which an animal is being fed. So how can this possibly be considered as fair, decent and humane? I would like you to answer that please as I am very interested to know how you can try and possibly justify that.

Whilst at Hmp Wakefield Charlie has a TV and a radio. Now since being moved to Hmp Long Lartin he has neither and none of his art materials to keep him occupied. This is so very clear that this is antagonistic moves to try and provoke Charlie for a reaction. Why would the prison system do this to him after he has displayed excellent behaviour for such a long period of time??

I would also like to raise formal complaints regarding the staff at Hmp Long Lartin and would like them to be accountable for their actions and treatment of Charlie since arriving there. Charlie arrived at their prison on the 22^nd April. Charlie’s mother and several of his other family members and friends tried to confirm this with the prison so that they knew where to send his mail. However the staff at Hmp Long Lartin for no apparent reason denied that they were holding him there. Then a few days later Charlie’s mother, myself and a few others received a letter from Charlie confirming that he was there and the treatment that he was getting which disgusted and infuriated all of us. I then spoke to Charlie’s legal team regarding this who insisted that they needed to visit Charlie to discuss this. However again the staff at Hmp Long Lartin denied he was being held there. Despite the legal team requesting daily to book a legal visit the staff denied he was there even though we all knew full well that he was. The legal team was as disgusted and infuriated as we were. Charlie is entitled to a legal visit just as anyone else is and as the prison system was denying this they were in fact breaching his human rights.

It was only when the deadline had been reached for an application to the courts for a legal visit was reached that they then admitted that he was there. This is constant proof that Charlie is treated unfairly, inhumanely and is continuously degraded and demoralised at the hands of the prison system and the staff working within it.

He is lied to and deceived, just as his family and friends are. This is not acceptable and the issues and the staff need to be accounted for and made responsible for their actions, just as Charlie has been. Charlie has more than paid for the crimes that he has committed. Yet no prison staff or authority are made accountable for theirs are they?

I therefore would like to register a formal complaint about all the issues that I have raised in this letter and would very much appreciate answers to the questions that I have asked. There is public outrage about Charlie’s treatment and all will be revealed as it continues.

I would very much appreciate a detailed response to this letter and would hope that you will give these matters your urgent attention. I believe that you are in your position of employment to ensure that the prison service operates at a certain standard and that should apply to all prisons, staff and prisoners.

I shall await to hear from you which I hope will be a prompt one,

Thanking you in anticipation,

Yours Sincerely,

Ms Dalanya Morris

Ms Anne Owers Chief Inspector of Prisons

HM Inspectorate of Prisons First Floor Ashley House 2 Monck Street London SW1P 2BQ

Dear Ms Anne Owers,

Ref: Mr Charles Bronson BT1314 HMP Long Lartin South Littleton Evesham Worcetshire WR11 8TZ

I am writing this letter to you for several reasons regarding my good friend, the above named person whom I will refer to as Charlie. I believe that as an inspector of prisons it is your duty to ensure that prisoners are treated decently, humanely and fairly within the prison system and to ensure that the staff working within them are providing a duty of care and are effectively supporting prisoners to rehabilitate and reduce the risk of re offending.

However for some unapparent reason Charlie appears to be an exception to these rules for the standards and policies that are supposed to be held within prison. Why this is the case no one knows not even Charlie himself, however it has become apparent for many years now that this is the case and is sit improving or getting better? The answer is no, not at all it is getting worse. So much so that more and more people are becoming aware of this and are backing and supporting Charlie in his bid for freedom as they can see the torture which he is made to endure whilst terrorist, child killers, rapists and paedophiles are treated of a much higher standard and are constantly being freed early on parole.

This is of total disbelief to the public and is totally shocking. Why would child killers, terrorists and paedophiles be treated of a much higher standard than of someone who was originally sentenced to seven years for armed robbery? Charlie has now served 34 years in prison and has spent 30 of them years in solitary confinement. Caged like an animal, fed like one with a tray simply being pushed under his door and kept on closed visits for ten years denying him any form at all of physical contact. Charlie has not been able to hug his 78 year old mother for ten years. How can this possibly be justified? It is a complete disgrace. Even an animal is not denied physical contact yet it seems that the prison system and authorities think that it is fair to deny it to Charlie. How can this be justified?

Whilst being in prison Charlie has rehabilitated himself. He has become a recognised author, poet and artist, for which he has won awards. He has also obeyed the rules and showed exemplary behaviour for ten years but is never recognised for this and has never been given the chance to progress in the system and still isn’t to this date. Why?

It is of my understanding by Mp Maria Eagle that “all prisoners should be treated with humanity and respect. The prison service should provide constructive regimes in decent, safe conditions that ensure the well being of prisoners and prepare them for resettlement in the community”. Could you therefore please explain to me as to why Charlie is an obvious exception to these rules and regulations? He is not treated with humanity being caged like an animal for over 30 years in solitary confinement and being denied physical contact for over ten years. He has not been given the chance to allow to progress within the system at all by even being allowed to associate with other prisoners let alone preparing him for resettlement into the community.

For a number of years now I have wrote to many officials and authorities asking questions about the treatment of Charlie and the torture that he has had to and still continues to endure, and surprisingly enough no one ever takes responsibility for it or answers the questions. Everyone seems to pass the buck to someone else, no one seems to want to be accounting for it. Yet someone has to. Enough is enough and all of the public are in agreement over it. The support and awareness of Charlie’s case is growing and will expand even further as I for one intend to pursue highlighting his case so that the public are fully aware of our apparent justice system. It is a complete farce.

Charlie spent six years in Hmp Wakefield. He went for a parole hearing on 11^th March, by law he should have been given an answer in 14 days. To this date he still has not been given it. Why?

Ms Jacqui Tilley the governor, as well as the judge and Charlie’ s legal tram assured him that any move from Hmp Wakefield would be a progressive one. More lies as this has not been the case at all. Ms Jacqui Tilley actually told Charlie that he would be given his answer for his parole review on the 27^th April, then for no apparent reason he was shipped out of Hmp Wakefield on the 22^nd April. Was it a progressive move? Did he get the answer he had long awaited? Of course he didn’t, once again he was fed lies and was tortured and antagonised by all of those involved.

Charlie was taken to Hmp Long Lartin where once again he was placed in segregation in a punishment cell. Where there is a drain in the floor and no lid on his toilet so that he has to endure a foul stench all day. He is fed by a tray being pushed under his door. Fair? Decent? Humane? All of these are questions which I would like for you to provide me with an answer to. You do not need to breach confidentiality or another other quote that you may try to use to avoid answering it. I would like to ask you directly as the Chief Inspector of Prisons, if you feel that this prisoner is being treated humanly, decently and fairly?

Whilst at Hmp Wakefield Charlie had a TV and a radio. Yet since being transferred to Hmp Long Lartin he has neither. They have even confiscated his art materials for no reason so he has nothing at all to keep him occupied. Why would they do this to him other than to demoralise, torture and antagonise him. It is of my firm opinion that all of this has been done to try and provoke a reaction from Charlie. Why would the prison staff and authorities try and do this to a man who has already suffered so much and why would they want to continue to demoralise and humiliate him in this way? These are all questions that desperate need answering and someone has to answer them.

After arriving at Hmp Long Lartin, Charlie’s 78 year old mother and other family members and friends tried to confirm if this was now where he was being held after being moved from Hmp Wakefield. The staff at Hmp Long Lartin denied totally that he was now with them. This went on for days. Even after his mum, myself and others received a letter from Charlie informing us he was at Hmp Long Lartin, the staff there still denied it.

I contacted Charlie’s legal team so that they were aware of his transfer and the conditions that he had been put in. They were obviously keen to get a legal visit booked. However the staff at the prison were still insisting that he wasn’t with them. This was to Charlie’s legal team, who were in total disbelief. They contacted the prison daily and were constantly lied to. It was only when they had reached their deadline so that the matter would have been taken to court that they finally admitted that he was there. This was therefore obstructing his legal team to book a legal visit which is a clear breach once again of Charlie’s human rights.

I would like to register this letter as a formal complaint regarding the torture that my friend is obviously receiving at the hands of the prison staff and authorities. I would also like to request a copy of your complaints procedure please. I would be most grateful if you could investigate all the matters that I have raised and please provide answers to the questions that I have asked. I would very much appreciate a prompt response to this matter as in the meantime my friend is having to endure this disgraceful treatment and I strongly feel that you have already caused a great deal of un necessary suffering to him and his family.

I shall await your response which I hope will be a prompt one, Thanking you in anticipation,

Yours Sincerely,

Ms Dalanya Morris

Director of High Security, Briefing and casework unit, Room 618 Cleland House, Page Street London SW1P 4LN

Dear Sir/Madam,

R.e Mr Charles Bronson BT1314 Hmp Long Lartin South Littleton Evesham Worcetshire WR11 8TZ

I am writing this letter to you for a number of reasons regarding the above named person who is a very good friend of mine and has been for many, many years. I would like to question the conditions that he is currently held in and has been for over 30 years. I would like to register a formal complaint regarding the suffering that he has endured and continues to endure and the recent events that have highlighted just how unjust and unfair the system is that you have him held under.

As you are fully aware Mr Bronson has never ever killed, molested or raped anyone. He is not and has never been involved in terrorism and all the crimes he has committed have been whilst in prison and, I believe have been caused the treatment he has been given and the failure of the system that he is held in.

Prison is supposed to ensure that the well being of prisoners is adhered to, their human rights upheld and is supposed to ensure effective codes of practise working towards rehabilitation and routes to reform. Mr Bronson, who I will from here on in refer to as Charlie has never been given this opportunity and the system still fails to recognise and address this. He has spent 30 years in solitary confinement, as you are well aware people that have committed murders, in fact more than one murder have spent less time in the prison system and are now free on our streets.

Charlie has rehabilitated himself through writing books, poetry and art. He has raised a lot of money for charities and still continues to do so. He has worked continuously alongside me assisting and advising young offenders, young people in the care system and many other disadvantaged children that I know both form professionally and socially. None of these matters I believe are ever taken into account and Charlie is continuously made to endure torture. Why would this happen? How can this happen?

Charlie has not committed a violent offence for ten years so if any behavioural targets were set, which they should have been for them to justify segregation for such a long period of time then Charlie would have completed them as he adhered to good behaviour for many years. However what incentive has he been given? What message is he continuously given by those in authority and power? They have witnessed first hand the change in Charlie and are fully aware of it but there has been no change in the system or the rules and regulations that he has been kept under.

For ten years now Charlie has been on closed visits and is denied any form of physical contact. He has not been able to hug his 78 year old mother for ten years. Prisoners are supposed to be treated with humanity and respect, Charlie never has been and the system still denies this to him. His human rights are continuously breached and he is kept locked in a cage demoralising and degrading him daily. The system and the government in control of it constantly antagonise and torture him. Why is this being allowed to happen? Why is no one accepting responsibility in making positive changes for Charlie yet continue to for rapists, paedophiles and child killers? How can this be justified? It simply can’t be!

Charlie was held at Hmp Wakefield for a period of six years. During this time I spoke to officers there whilst I was visiting Charlie. Each officer voiced their opinion that Charlie should not be there and they did not agree with what he is made to suffer. Officers informed me that during their career they had witnesses inmates that had killed whilst in prison who were free to now associate with other inmates and were given prospects of release. Charlie has neither.

I have enclosed a copy of a letter that I have addressed to Mp Maria Eagle. As you will see I have listed a number of offenders who have raped, killed, chopped up bodies and molested them but were freed on parole. Charlie still has not been given parole or has not even been decategorised or allowed to associate with other inmates. Could you please explain to me why in a system that prides itself on apparently being ‘fair’ and ‘upholds human rights’ that this case always proves to be an exception to the rules. How can you possibly justify freeing a man that has murdered and yet keeping a man who never has locked in complete isolation without any form of human contact for over 30 years???

Charlie was spoken highly of by all the officers whom I met at Hmp Wakefield and they too were very surprised that the system and officials were not allowing him to progress let alone assisting him to as they do for all other prisoners. Why should Charlie’s case be any exception to the rules and why is it??

Charlie was assured by the Ms Jacqui Tilley the governor of Hmp Wakefield that he would at long last receive an answer about his parole on 27^th April and that any move from Hmp Wakefield would be a progressive one. Then for no apparent reason he was shipped out on the 22^nd April. His move was not a progressive one at all. He after all these years of good behaviour was shipped to Hmp Long Lartin. Here he was again placed in isolation in a punishment cell where he has a drain in the floor and no lid on his toilet seat so his cell continuously stinks. There is no power point and he no longer has any radio or TV. Normally he would have his art to keep his sanity and occupy him which is only fait, however this also for no reason has been taken from him. I cannot even begin to try to comprehend why they would do such a thing to him? I neither can be given no answers as to why they have done this to him and neither can Charlie himself. He has been lied to and ill treated constantly. It is obvious that this is to antagonise and torture him but for what purpose and what gain?

I strongly urge you to review Charlie’s case and would also like to ask if you could please answer the questions that I have asked as you must have reason and cause to treat someone this way, or at least think that you have. His categorisation and current placement need to be urgently reviewed as does the treatment he has been receiving since going to Long Lartin.

Charlie was there for a number of days yet the prison staff denied this to all those trying to contact him. His 78 year old mother was becoming increasingly concerned and of very ill health as she could not find out at all where he had been moved to. Despite finally being advised by Hmp Wakefield that he was now at Hmp Long Lartin the staff there firmly denied it. Then both Charlie’s mother, myself and other friends of Charlie received letters from him stating that he was there and what they were doing to him. However when Charlie’s lawyer was contacting the prison to try and obtain a legal visit they also denied to her that he was there, preventing her from getting to see him. It was only when they had reached their deadline, before court proceedings would have begun did they finally admit that he was there. So again his human rights were breached as he was being denied a legal visit which everyone is entitled to.

Why has Charlie’s categorisation to changed? Why does he still remain on closed visits and denied any form of physical contact? Why is the people in authority torturing him in this manner. Do you not believe that he has suffered enough? Can you not see by his good behaviour for the last ten years that he is a changed and reformed man? How can Charlie change and still not be accepted or considered to be changed? Why is he constantly being denied to progress? This has become a clear miscarriage of justice and the support for Charlie and his case is increasing rapidly due to this. Everyone agrees that he should be allowed to progress and be given his freedom or progression towards it. It has now constantly been denied. No one is willing to accept responsibility and take the right steps in allowing him to do so. Neither are they prepared to answer or justify their decisions, which I strongly feel is because they can’t.

I therefore would like to register this as a formal complaint against the inhumane and unjust situation that my good friend is still in and would like to be given full details of your complaints procedure.

I would very much appreciate your urgent attention to this matter and would be most grateful if you could answer directly the questions which I have asked which I do not feel will be difficult if you have reason to justify and support them.

I shall await your reply which I hope will be a prompt one,

Yours Sincerely

Ms Dalanya Morris